Court cases
Showing EU · 2025. Clear filters
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TO0375_INF
Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2025.#Renate Holzeisen v European Commission.#Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Marketing authorisation for Kostaive-zapomeran – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-375/25 R.22 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TO0375
Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2025.#Renate Holzeisen v European Commission.#Case T-375/25 R.22 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0433_INF
Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#Commission européenne contre Royaume d'Espagne.#Manquement d’État – Article 258 TFUE – Directive 91/271/CEE – Collecte et traitement des eaux urbaines résiduaires – Articles 3 à 5 et 15 – Actualisation de la charge polluante générée par les agglomérations, exprimée en équivalent habitant (EH) – Rejet.#Affaire C-433/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0366_SUM
Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#Amazon EU Sàrl contre Ministre de la Culture et Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur – Libre prestation de services – Libre circulation des marchandises – Protection ou promotion de la diversité culturelle – Service de livraison à domicile de livres – Mesure nationale prévoyant une tarification minimale pour un tel service – Directive 2006/123/CE – Applicabilité – Articulation avec les articles 34 et 56 TFUE.#Affaire C-366/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0776_SUM
Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#CJ contre Service fédéral des Pensions (SFP).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fonctionnaires – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Annexe VIII – Pensions – Droits à pension acquis avant l’entrée au service de l’Union européenne – Transfert au régime de pension des institutions de l’Union européenne – Demande de transfert du travailleur – Irrévocabilité de ce transfert – Enrichissement sans cause.#Affaire C-776/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CO0502_INF
Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#« YETTEL BULGARIA » EAD contre FB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour ainsi que du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-502/25.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0548_INF
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Single supervisory mechanism – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 4 – Setting of prudential requirements – Article 16 – Risk linked to irrevocable payment commitments (IPCs) given in favour of deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds – Deduction in full from the Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the sums paid as collateral for the IPCs – Discretion of the ECB – Judicial review.#Case C-548/24 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0550_INF
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Société générale v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Single supervisory mechanism – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 4 – Setting of prudential requirements – Article 16 – Risk linked to irrevocable payment commitments (IPCs) given in favour of deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds – Deduction in full from the Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the sums paid as collateral for the IPCs – Discretion of the ECB – Judicial review.#Case C-550/24 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0353_SUM
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SIA „EUROPARK LATVIA” and SKIDATA GmbH v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Industrial policy – Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Concept of ‘technical regulation’ – National rule requiring the provision of the source code of software registered in the database of the tax authority to a body responsible for assessing the conformity of fiscal technical requirements – Article 34 TFEU – Measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-353/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CO0491_INF
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) v Amazon Italia Services Srl and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Empowering national competition authorities to enforce the rules on competition – Directive (EU) 2019/1 – Independence of national competition authorities – Article 4(5) – Setting priorities for the proceedings for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Fines on undertakings and associations of undertakings – Article 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to commence the inter partes investigation stage of the procedure within a time limit of 90 days, starting from the moment it has knowledge of the infringement – Annulment of the decision of that authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Revocation of the power to penalise the practice concerned – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings.#Case C-491/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CO0272_INF
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Maud Tea & Seed Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Plant protection products – Active substances clothianidin and thiamethoxam – Determination of maximum residue levels for the relevant active substances in or on certain products – Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 – Conditions of admissibility of the action – Direct concern – Evidence.#Case C-272/25 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0731_SUM
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Nicoventures Trading Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Public health – Heated tobacco products – Withdrawal of certain exemptions – Delegated Directive EU 2022/2100 – Action for annulment – Standing – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the contested act – Limited class of economic operators – Reporting and notification obligations – Marketing authorisation.#Case C-731/23 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0259_SUM
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SAS Tenergie Development v Directeur Régional des Douanes de Marseille and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Import and export procedures – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Transmission of the file requesting remission to the European Commission – Automatic remission of duties – Liability of the Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-259/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0345_SUM
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v BRT SpA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Postal parcel delivery services provided to the public – Directive 97/67/EC – Articles 22 and 22a – Regulation (EU) 2018/644 – Article 4 – Decision of the national regulatory authority imposing on parcel delivery service providers obligations to provide information – Legal basis for the competence of that authority to impose specific obligations to provide information on operators not carrying out cross-border parcel delivery – Proportionality.#Case C-345/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CO0745_SUM
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v GLOBUS Handelshof GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic products – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Article 3(52) – Concept of ‘labelling’ – Concept of ‘label’ – Article 3(53) – Concept of ‘advertising’ – Article 30(1) – Products bearing terms referring to organic production – Article 32(1)(a) – Obligation to indicate the code number of the control authority or control body to which the operator that carried out the last production or preparation operation is subject – Inapplicability to advertising leaflets promoting those products.#Case C-745/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0168_SUM
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#PMJC SAS v [W] [X] and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Art. 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief.#Case C-168/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0552_INF
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Single supervisory mechanism – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 4 – Setting of prudential requirements – Article 16 – Risk linked to irrevocable payment commitments (IPCs) given in favour of deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds – Deduction in full from the Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the sums paid as collateral for the IPCs – Discretion of the ECB – Judicial review.#Case C-552/24 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0184_SUM
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#AF, en son nom propre et en qualité de personne exerçant la responsabilité parentale sur l’enfant mineur BF v Ministero dell’Interno - U.T.G. - Prefettura di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre.#Case C-184/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0323_SUM
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L. and Stay Design, S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Articles 4 to 6 and 14 – Conditions for the protection of a design – Novelty – Individual character – Visual characteristics predetermined by a third party – Freedom of the designer in developing the design – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Influence of features linked to fashion trends.#Case C-323/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0260_SUM
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Wholesale market for fuel in Bulgaria – Margin squeeze on competitors – Product market definition – Vertically divided market – Taking into account the excise duty regime.#Case C-260/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0325_SUM
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#HG v Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Firenze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure – Article 24 – Hearing of the accused person by videoconference – Article 24(2)(b) – Fundamental principles of the law of the executing Member State.#Case C-325/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CO0240_SUM
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Proceedings brought by.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary acting as a deputy for another notary – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Measures relating to the European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Refusal by a bank to recognise the European Certificate of Succession – Article 71 – Initiation by a notary, of his or her own motion, of the procedure for the withdrawal or modification of the European Certificate of Succession – No exercise of a judicial function – Inadmissibility.#Case C-240/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0422_SUM
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten v AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 13 and 14 – Scope – Personal data collected by means of body cameras worn by ticket inspectors on public transport – Legal basis for the obligation on the data controller to provide information to the data subject.#Case C-422/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CO0491
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) v Amazon Italia Services Srl and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Case C-491/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CO0502
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#„YETTEL BULGARIA“ EAD v FB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-502/25.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CO0272
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Maud Tea & Seed Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Plant protection products – Active substances clothianidin and thiamethoxam – Determination of maximum residue levels for the relevant active substances in or on certain products – Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 – Conditions of admissibility of the action – Direct concern – Evidence.#Case C-272/25 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CO0293
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RT v Sofiyska apelativna prokuratura.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Case C-293/25.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CO0745
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v GLOBUS Handelshof GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic products – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Article 3(52) – Concept of ‘labelling’ – Concept of ‘label’ – Article 3(53) – Concept of ‘advertising’ – Article 30(1) – Products bearing terms referring to organic production – Article 32(1)(a) – Obligation to indicate the code number of the control authority or control body to which the operator that carried out the last production or preparation operation is subject – Inapplicability to advertising leaflets promoting those products.#Case C-745/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CO0240
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Proceedings brought by.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Notariusz w Krapkowicach Justyna Gawlica - Krapkowice.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary acting as a deputy for another notary – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Measures relating to the European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Refusal by a bank to recognise the European Certificate of Succession – Article 71 – Initiation by a notary, of his or her own motion, of the procedure for the withdrawal or modification of the European Certificate of Succession – No exercise of a judicial function – Inadmissibility.#Case C-240/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0552
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v European Central Bank.#Case C-552/24 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0433
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Case C-433/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0550
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Société générale v European Central Bank.#Case C-550/24 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0548
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Central Bank.#Case C-548/24 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0136
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0136_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0679
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0679_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0731
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Nicoventures Trading Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Public health – Heated tobacco products – Withdrawal of certain exemptions – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Action for annulment – Standing – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the contested act – Limited class of economic operators – Reporting and notification obligations – Marketing authorisation.#Case C-731/23 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0448_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 2 TEU – Article 4(3) TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law – Principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law – Principle of the binding effect of the case-law of the Court – Judgments of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court, Poland) – Judgments of the Court and interim measures under Article 279 TFEU relating to the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rejection by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) of those judgments and of those measures as ultra vires – National constitutional identity – Prohibition issued by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) preventing all public authorities from applying Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Improper composition of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court).#Case C-448/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0448
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 2 TEU – Article 4(3) TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law – Principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law – Principle of the binding effect of the case-law of the Court – Judgments of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court, Poland) – Judgments of the Court and interim measures under Article 279 TFEU relating to the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rejection by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) of those judgments and of those measures as ultra vires – National constitutional identity – Prohibition issued by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) preventing all public authorities from applying Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Improper composition of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court).#Case C-448/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0776
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CJ v Service fédéral des Pensions (SFP).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Annex VIII – Pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the pension scheme of the European Union institutions – Transfer request of the worker – Irrevocability of that transfer – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-776/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0417_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Concepts of ‘ethnic origin’, ‘direct discrimination’ and ‘indirect discrimination’ – National legislation requiring the adoption of development plans designed to reduce the percentage of public family housing units in certain residential areas – Identification of those areas according to the proportion of ‘immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants’ – Whether justified – Social cohesion and integration – Housing policy – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for the home – Proportionality.#Case C-417/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0417
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Concepts of ‘ethnic origin’, ‘direct discrimination’ and ‘indirect discrimination’ – National legislation requiring the adoption of development plans designed to reduce the percentage of public family housing units in certain residential areas – Identification of those areas according to the proportion of ‘immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants’ – Whether justified – Social cohesion and integration – Housing policy – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for the home – Proportionality.#Case C-417/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0182
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RB, en qualité d’ayant droit de Claude Chabrol and Others v Société des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques (SACD) and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 and 8 – Directive 2004/48/EC – Articles 1 to 3 – Directive 2006/115/EC – Directive 2006/116/EC – Articles 1, 2 and 9 – Articles 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Right to an effective remedy – National legislation under which the admissibility of an action for infringement brought by one of the joint holders of the copyright in a cinematographic work is conditional on all the joint holders of that copyright being called on to participate in the proceedings.#Case C-182/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0182_RES
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RB, en qualité d’ayant droit de Claude Chabrol and Others v Société des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques (SACD) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 and 8 – Directive 2004/48/EC – Articles 1 to 3 – Directive 2006/115/EC – Directive 2006/116/EC – Articles 1, 2 and 9 – Articles 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Right to an effective remedy – National legislation making the admissibility of an action for infringement brought by one of the co-holders of the copyright in a cinematographic work conditional on all of the co-holders of that copyright being called on to participate in the proceedings.#Case C-182/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0345
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v BRT SpA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Postal parcel delivery services provided to the public – Directive 97/67/EC – Articles 22 and 22a – Regulation (EU) 2018/644 – Article 4 – Decision of the national regulatory authority imposing on parcel delivery service providers obligations to provide information – Legal basis for the competence of that authority to impose specific obligations to provide information on operators not carrying out cross-border parcel delivery – Proportionality.#Case C-345/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0353
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SIA „EUROPARK LATVIA” and SKIDATA GmbH v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Industrial policy – Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Concept of ‘technical regulation’ – National rule requiring the provision of the source code of software registered in the database of the tax authority to a body responsible for assessing the conformity of fiscal technical requirements – Article 34 TFEU – Measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-353/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0323
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L. and Stay Design, S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Articles 4 to 6 and 14 – Conditions for the protection of a design – Novelty – Individual character – Visual characteristics predetermined by a third party – Freedom of the designer in developing the design – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Influence of features linked to fashion trends.#Case C-323/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0260
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Wholesale market for fuel in Bulgaria – Margin squeeze on competitors – Product market definition – Vertically divided market – Taking into account the excise duty regime.#Case C-260/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0245
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD and « Lukoil Neftohim Burgas » AD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Market for the storage of automotive fuels – Abuse – Refusal of access to essential infrastructure for third-party undertakings – Infrastructure financed by public funds – Privatisation of that infrastructure.#Case C-245/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0245_RES
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD and « Lukoil Neftohim Burgas » AD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Market for the storage of automotive fuels – Abuse – Refusal of access to essential infrastructure for third-party undertakings – Infrastructure financed by public funds – Privatisation of that infrastructure.#Case C-245/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0316_RES
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Appeal – Agriculture – Plant protection products – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 – Renewal of the approval of the active substance ‘cypermethrin’ – Request for internal review – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Decision refusing the request – Risk assessment and risk management – Identification of critical areas of concern – Realistic conditions of use – Precautionary principle.#Case C-316/24 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0481
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#E. sp.j. v C. sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Article 3(1) and (3)(a) – Interest for late payment – Article 6(1) and (2) – Compensation for recovery costs – Conditions – National legislation providing for the set-off of reciprocal claims by declaration with retroactive effect – Simultaneous extinguishment of claims up to the amount of the lowest claim – Effects on interest and on compensation.#Case C-481/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0481_RES
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#E. sp.j. v C. sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Article 3(1) and (3)(a) – Interest for late payment – Article 6(1) and (2) – Compensation for recovery costs – Conditions – National legislation providing for the set-off of reciprocal claims by declaration with retroactive effect – Simultaneous extinguishment of claims up to the amount of the lowest claim – Effects on interest and on compensation.#Case C-481/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0161
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#OSA, z.s., anciennement OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Collective management organisation handling copyright – Rates for royalties for the provision of a licence to make copyrighted works available – Hotel establishments – Calculation method – Failure to take into account the rate of occupancy of rooms – Unfair prices.#Case C-161/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0161_RES
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#OSA, z.s., anciennement OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Collective management organisation handling copyright – Rates for royalties for the provision of a licence to make copyrighted works available – Hotel establishments – Calculation method – Failure to take into account the rate of occupancy of rooms – Unfair prices.#Case C-161/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0320_RES
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CR and TP v Soledil Srl, sous concordat préventif.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Power of review and obligations of the national court – Penalty clause – No review of the court’s own motion of whether that term is unfair – Res judicata – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reliance on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court to which the case has been remitted following cassation.#Case C-320/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0320
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CR and TP v Soledil Srl, sous concordat préventif.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Power of review and obligations of the national court – Penalty clause – No review of the court’s own motion of whether that term is unfair – Res judicata – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reliance on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court to which the case has been remitted following cassation.#Case C-320/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0325
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Criminal proceedings v HG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Firenze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure – Article 24 – Hearing of the accused person by videoconference – Article 24(2)(b) – Fundamental principles of the law of the executing Member State.#Case C-325/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0296
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SM and Others v Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Social advantages – Family allowance – Condition for granting that allowance to a non-resident worker for a child of his or her spouse or registered partner – Requirement that that worker must ‘support’ that child – Assessment criteria – Presumption based on the existence of a joint household – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 2(2)(c) – Concept of ‘family member’.#Joined Cases C-296/24 to C-307/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0296_RES
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SM and Others v Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Social advantages – Family allowance – Condition for granting that allowance to a non-resident worker for a child of his or her spouse or registered partner – Requirement that that worker must ‘support’ that child – Assessment criteria – Presumption based on the existence of a joint household – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 2(2)(c) – Concept of ‘family member’.#Joined Cases C-296/24 to C-307/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0168
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#PMJC SAS v [W] [X] and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Art. 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief.#Case C-168/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0633
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Electrabel SA and Others v Commission de Régulation de l’Electricité et du Gaz (CREG).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Emergency intervention to address high energy prices – Article 2(5) and (9) – Articles 6 to 8 – Cap on market revenues obtained by electricity producers using certain energy sources – Determination of ‘market revenues’ – National legislation providing for the use of presumptions that are either irrebuttable or rebuttable by means of other presumptions – Principle of proportionality – Article 22(2)(c) – Period of application of Articles 6 to 8 of that regulation – Application of a measure capping revenue for a period prior to that provided for in that regulation, pursuant to national legislation adopted after the entry into force of that regulation – Principles of the primacy and effectiveness of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-633/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0633_RES
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Electrabel SA and Others v Commission de Régulation de l’Electricité et du Gaz (CREG).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Emergency intervention to address high energy prices – Article 2(5) and (9) – Articles 6 to 8 – Cap on market revenues obtained by electricity producers using certain energy sources – Determination of ‘market revenues’ – National legislation providing for the use of presumptions that are either irrebuttable or rebuttable by means of other presumptions – Principle of proportionality – Article 22(2)(c) – Period of application of Articles 6 to 8 of that regulation – Application of a measure capping revenue for a period prior to that provided for in that regulation, pursuant to national legislation adopted after the entry into force of that regulation – Principles of the primacy and effectiveness of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-633/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0769_RES
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence aspects – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0769
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0560_RES
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#H (ved DRC Dansk Flygtningehjælp) v Udlændingestyrelsen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 29(1) – Transfer time limit – Determination of the starting point of the six-month time limit – Bringing of an appeal with suspensive effect – New circumstance brought to the attention of the judicial authority before which that appeal was brought – Annulment of the initial transfer decision and remittal of the case to the competent administrative authority – Adoption of a second transfer decision which is also the subject of an action for annulment – Consequences for the calculation of the transfer time limit.#Case C-560/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0560
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#H (ved DRC Dansk Flygtningehjælp) v Udlændingestyrelsen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Flygtningenævnet København.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 29(1) – Transfer time limit – Determination of the starting point of the six-month time limit – Bringing of an appeal with suspensive effect – New circumstance brought to the attention of the judicial authority before which that appeal was brought – Annulment of the initial transfer decision and remittal of the case to the competent administrative authority – Adoption of a second transfer decision which is also the subject of an action for annulment – Consequences for the calculation of the transfer time limit.#Case C-560/23.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0184
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#AF, en son nom propre et en qualité de personne exerçant la responsabilité parentale sur l’enfant mineur BF v Ministero dell’Interno - U.T.G. - Prefettura di Milano.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre.#Case C-184/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0316
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Appeal – Agriculture – Plant protection products – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 – Renewal of the approval of the active substance ‘cypermethrin’ – Request for internal review – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Decision refusing the request – Risk assessment and risk management – Identification of critical areas of concern – Realistic conditions of use – Precautionary principle.#Case C-316/24 P.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0259
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SAS Tenergie Development v Directeur Régional des Douanes de Marseille and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Import and export procedures – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Transmission of the file requesting remission to the European Commission – Automatic remission of duties – Liability of the Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-259/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0366
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Amazon EU Sàrl v Ministre de la Culture and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Freedom to provide services – Free movement of goods – Protection or promotion of cultural diversity – Home delivery of books service – National measure providing for a minimum charge in respect of such a service – Directive 2006/123/EC – Applicability – Relationship with Articles 34 and 56 TFEU.#Case C-366/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0422
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten v AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 13 and 14 – Scope – Personal data collected by means of body cameras worn by ticket inspectors on public transport – Legal basis for the obligation on the data controller to provide information to the data subject.#Case C-422/24.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CO0293_INF
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RT v Sofiyska apelativna prokuratura.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Question the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of execution of a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 8(1) – Recognition of a judgment imposing a custodial sentence for the purpose of enforcing the sentence – Article 25 – Compliance with the conditions and procedure laid down by that framework decision in the event that a Member State undertakes to enforce a sentence imposed by a judgment delivered by a court of the State issuing the European arrest warrant – Consent on the part of the issuing State as regards the assumption of responsibility for the enforcement of such a sentence by a Member State – Application of Framework Decision 2008/909 to the recognition procedure in that Member State.#Case C-293/25.18 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0671_INF
Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 17 décembre 2025.#GY contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Rémunération – Allocations familiales – Allocation pour enfant à charge – Enfant atteint d’une maladie de longue durée – Refus d’octroi de la double allocation – Article 67, paragraphe 3, du statut – Obligation de motivation – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-671/24.17 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0037_INF
Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 17 décembre 2025.#CB contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Recrutement – Concours général EPSO/AST/150/21 – Décision de ne pas inscrire le nom du requérant sur la liste de réserve – Égalité de traitement.#Affaire T-37/24.17 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0483_INF
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2025.#FE v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Rules governing expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Amendment of the additional voluntary pension scheme – Notice fixing additional voluntary pension rights – Plea of illegality – Acquired rights – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Right to property – Proportionality – Parliamentary independence – Equal treatment – Request for the removal of documents from the case file.#Case T-483/24.17 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0268_INF
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Igor Rotenberg v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefitting from Russian decision-makers or from the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(d) and (f) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-268/24.17 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CO0545_INF
Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 17 December 2025.#České dráhy, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Markets for the provision of domestic long-distance rail passenger transport services in the Czech Republic and for the provision of international long-distance rail passenger transport services between Austria and the Czech Republic on the Prague-Vienna route – Access to used railway wagons for long-distance passenger transport in those markets – European Commission decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Action for annulment – Co-perpetrator of that infringement – Interest in the result of the case – None.#Case C-545/25 P(I).17 December 2025
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CO0028_INF
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#LEAL Lega Antivivisezionista ODV and Others v Provincia autonoma di Trento and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Disputes in the main proceedings which have become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate.#Joined Cases C-28/24 to C-31/24.17 December 2025