Court cases
Showing 2026. Clear filters
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0176_RES
Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#IU contre BT.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Loi applicable aux obligations contractuelles – Règlement (CE) no 593/2008 (Rome I) – Loi applicable aux obligations non contractuelles – Règlement (CE) no 864/2007 (Rome II) – Obligation non contractuelle résultant d’une atteinte, par un tiers, aux droits d’utilisation exclusifs prétendument détenus par une personne sur des œuvres protégées par le droit d’auteur – Contestation par le défendeur de la validité formelle du contrat de cession entre le cessionnaire de ces droits et l’auteur – Rattachement de cette question à la matière contractuelle.#Affaire C-176/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0151_RES
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#F.B. contre Région wallonne.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Convention d’Aarhus – Article 6 – Participation du public aux décisions relatives à des activités particulières – Prolongation de la durée de validité d’un permis d’exploitation d’un parc éolien – Obligation d’organiser une phase de participation du public préalablement à cette prolongation.#Affaire C-151/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0369_RES
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#LW contre Trenitalia SpA et Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Obligation de l’employeur d’informer le travailleur des conditions applicables au contrat ou à la relation de travail – Directive 91/533/CEE – Article 8, paragraphe 1 – Défense des droits – Portée de cette disposition – Protection des droits découlant de cette directive – Article 3 – Droit pour le travailleur de recevoir un document contenant des informations sur les éléments essentiels du contrat ou de la relation de travail.#Affaire C-369/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0381_RES
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#PL et GQ contre Gexx aeroSol GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 2011/83/UE – Contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Droit de rétractation en cas de contrats hors établissement – Article 2, point 8 – Notion de “contrat hors établissement” – Offre écrite du professionnel – Acceptation de cette offre par le consommateur en la présence du professionnel et en dehors de l’établissement commercial de ce dernier.#Affaire C-381/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0300
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (třetího senátu) ze dne 24. září 2026.#SQ v. YR.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Prostor svobody, bezpečnosti a práva – Nařízení (EU) 2016/1103 – Příslušnost, rozhodné právo a uznávání a výkon rozhodnutí ve věcech majetkových poměrů v manželství – Článek 1 odst. 1 – Oblast působnosti – Článek 3 odst. 1 písm. a) – Pojem ‚majetkové poměry v manželství‘ – Nemovitost nabytá do podílového spoluvlastnictví manželi, kteří si při uzavření manželství ujednali režim oddělených jmění – Žaloba na zrušení a vypořádání tohoto podílového spoluvlastnictví podaná po zrušení manželství – Zahrnutí.#Věc C-300/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0176
Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#IU contre BT.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Loi applicable aux obligations contractuelles – Règlement (CE) n° 593/2008 (Rome I) – Loi applicable aux obligations non contractuelles – Règlement (CE) n° 864/2007 (Rome II) – Obligation non contractuelle résultant d’une atteinte, par un tiers, aux droits d’utilisation exclusifs prétendument détenus par une personne sur des œuvres protégées par le droit d’auteur – Contestation par le défendeur de la validité formelle du contrat de cession entre le cessionnaire de ces droits et l’auteur – Rattachement de cette question à la matière contractuelle.#Affaire C-176/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0600
Решение на Съда (седми състав) от 24 септември 2026 г.#M. P. M. срещу Ministerstvo na zemedelieto i hranite и др.#Преюдициално запитване — Селско стопанство — Обща селскостопанска политика (ОСП) — Европейски земеделски фонд за развитие на селските райони (ЕЗФРСР) — Мерки за подпомагане на развитието на селските райони — Регламент (ЕО) № 1974/2006 — Член 47 — Договор за наем или аренда — Договор за наем, сключен между общинска администрация и бенефициер на помощ — Ангажименти за период от пет години — Прекратяване на този договор за наем вследствие на законодателна реформа — Задължение за възстановяване на част или на цялата получена помощ — Невъзможност за адаптиране на ангажиментите към ново положение в съответното стопанство — Понятия „непреодолима сила“ и „извънредни обстоятелства“ — Принципи на правото на Съюза — Отговорност на държавите членки за вреди, причинени на частноправните субекти от нарушения на правото на Съюза — Условия за ангажиране — Разпоредба, която има за цел да предостави права на частноправните субекти.#Дело C-600/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0511
Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#Ministerstvo vnitra contre E. K.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Critères et mécanismes de détermination de l’État membre responsable de l’examen d’une demande de protection internationale – Règlement (UE) no 604/2013 – État membre responsable de l’examen d’une demande de protection internationale en vertu de l’article 3, paragraphe 2, premier alinéa, de ce règlement – Demande de protection internationale introduite dans un autre État membre – Article 17 – Clause discrétionnaire – Champ d’application.#Affaire C-511/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0503
Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#Acciaierie d’Italia SpA, en administration temporaire contre Cassa per i servizi energetici e ambientali (CSEA).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Régimes d’aides en faveur des entreprises grandes consommatrices de gaz naturel ou d’électricité – Dispositions nationales excluant de ces régimes les entreprises en difficulté au sens des lignes directrices concernant les aides d’État au sauvetage et à la restructuration d’entreprises en difficulté autres que les établissements financiers – Notion d’“entreprise en difficulté” – Régime national de l’administration extraordinaire.#Affaire C-503/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0369
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#LW contre Trenitalia SpA et Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Obligation de l’employeur d’informer le travailleur des conditions applicables au contrat ou à la relation de travail – Directive 91/533/CEE – Article 8, paragraphe 1 – Défense des droits – Portée de cette disposition – Protection des droits découlant de cette directive – Article 3 – Droit pour le travailleur de recevoir un document contenant des informations sur les éléments essentiels du contrat ou de la relation de travail.#Affaire C-369/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0381
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#PL et GQ contre Gexx aeroSol GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 2011/83/UE – Contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Droit de rétractation en cas de contrats hors établissement – Article 2, point 8 – Notion de “contrat hors établissement” – Offre écrite du professionnel – Acceptation de cette offre par le consommateur en la présence du professionnel et en dehors de l’établissement commercial de ce dernier.#Affaire C-381/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0190
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Dritte Kammer) vom 24. September 2026.#LS gegen GT.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen – Zuständigkeit, Anerkennung und Vollstreckung von Entscheidungen in Ehesachen – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2201/2003 – Art. 19 – Begriff ‚Antrag auf Ungültigerklärung einer Ehe‘ – Art. 63 – Vertrag zwischen dem Heiligen Stuhl und einem Mitgliedstaat – Nach kanonischem Recht geschlossene Ehe – Zivilgericht eines Mitgliedstaats, das mit einem Scheidungsantrag befasst ist – Zivilgericht eines anderen Mitgliedstaats, das mit einem Antrag auf Anerkennung der zivilrechtlichen Wirkungen einer Entscheidung eines Kirchengerichts befasst ist, mit der diese Ehe für nichtig erklärt wurde.#Rechtssache C-190/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0900
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Dritte Kammer) vom 24. September 2026.#SVB – Neues Schweizer Viertel Betriebs + Service GmbH & Co. KG gegen Glarner Straße 5 GbR.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Verbraucherschutz – Richtlinie 93/13/EWG – Missbräuchliche Klauseln in Verbraucherverträgen – Art. 1 Abs. 2 – Begriff ‚bindende Rechtsvorschriften‘ – Art. 6 – Folgen der Feststellung der Missbräuchlichkeit einer Klausel – Fortbestand des Vertrags ohne missbräuchliche Klauseln – Begriff ,nationale dispositive Bestimmungen‘ – Art. 7 Abs. 1 – Befugnis des nationalen Gerichts, den Folgen des Wegfalls einer missbräuchlichen Klausel zu begegnen – Bedingungen – Langjähriger Energielieferungsvertrag, der missbräuchliche Preisänderungsklauseln enthält – Befugnis des Gewerbetreibenden, eine missbräuchliche Preisänderungsklausel einseitig durch eine Klausel zu ersetzen, die im Einklang mit dieser Richtlinie stehen soll.#Rechtssache C-900/24.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0151
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#F.B. contre Région wallonne.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Convention d’Aarhus – Article 6 – Participation du public aux décisions relatives à des activités particulières – Prolongation de la durée de validité d’un permis d’exploitation d’un parc éolien – Obligation d’organiser une phase de participation du public préalablement à cette prolongation.#Affaire C-151/25.24 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0409
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Bitmain Technologies Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ANTMINER – Earlier EU word mark ANTCHAIN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Identity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-409/25.23 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0584
Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 23 septembre 2026.#Oleg Polikarpovich Tkach contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques ou faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Maintien du nom du requérant sur les listes – Soutien aux actions qui compromettent l’intégrité territoriale de l’Ukraine – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous a), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-584/24.23 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0455_EXT
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2026 (Extracts).#Advanz Pharma Ltd v European Commission.#Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Orphan medicinal product for human use Ocaliva – obeticholic acid – Revocation of the conditional marketing authorisation – Procedure for review – Procedure initiated without awaiting the outcome of the renewal procedure – Consultation of an ad-hoc expert group by the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use – Impartiality of the experts consulted – Declaration of a conflict of interest – Procedural defect – Principle of sound administration – Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended by Directive 2004/27/EC – Manifest errors of assessment – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/5.#Case T-455/24.23 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0231
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Deva Holding Anonim Şirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Devatis – International registration of the earlier word mark NOVARTIS – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No link between the signs.#Case T-231/25.23 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0232
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Deva Holding Anonim Şirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Devatis – International registration of the earlier word mark NOVARTIS – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No link between the signs.#Case T-232/25.23 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0239
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#OAO Belaz-upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belaz Holding v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Support for the Lukashenko regime – State-owned undertaking – Financial support – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-239/24.23 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0240
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#OAO Minskii Avtomobilnyi Zavod - upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belavtomaz v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Support for the Lukashenko regime – State-owned undertaking – Financial support – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-240/24.23 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0463
Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 23 septembre 2026.#Stéphanie Christiane Demblon contre Parlement européen.#Droit institutionnel – Réglementation concernant la sécurité et la protection au Parlement – Règles d’accès au Parlement – Interdiction d’accès – Décision initiale du Parlement portant interdiction d’accès aux bâtiments du Parlement – Remplacement de la décision initiale par une décision ultérieure – Demande de non-lieu à statuer – Rejet – Article 7 des règles d’accès au Parlement – Intérêt du Parlement – Situations spécifiques – Liberté d’expression – Liberté de réunion – Droit d’être entendu – Proportionnalité – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-463/24.23 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0721_RES
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 17 septembre 2026.#Vista-Life Pharma SA et Vista-Life Pharma Belgium SCRL contre Laboratoires S.M.B. SA et Brussels Reps Pharma SRL.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Règlement (CE) no 1924/2006 – Allégations nutritionnelles et de santé portant sur les denrées alimentaires – Article 2, paragraphe 2, point 5 – Notion d’“allégation de santé” – Complément alimentaire – Indications relatives à la fréquence de prise et/ou à la voie d’administration – Article 14, paragraphe 2 – Allégations relatives à la réduction d’un risque de maladie – Conditions applicables – Publicité faisant la promotion d’un complément alimentaire.#Affaire C-721/24.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0657_RES
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 17 septembre 2026.#Kyberg Pharma Vertriebs-GmbH contre Schutzverband gegen Unwesen in der Wirtschaft eV.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Règlement (CE) no 1924/2006 – Allégations nutritionnelles et de santé portant sur les denrées alimentaires – Article 10, paragraphe 2 – Conditions spécifiques applicables aux allégations de santé – Informations obligatoires – Mention indiquant l’importance d’une alimentation variée et équilibrée et d’un mode de vie sain – Emplacement – Notions d’“étiquetage” et de “publicité” – Complément alimentaire faisant l’objet d’un encart publicitaire dans la presse écrite.#Affaire C-657/24.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0438_RES
Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 17 septembre 2026.#Erakond Eestimaa Rohelised contre Vabariigi Valimiskomisjon e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 17, paragraphe 1, et article 39 – Principe de démocratie – Droit d’éligibilité aux élections au Parlement européen – Limitation de l’exercice de ce droit – Article 52, paragraphe 1 – Acte portant élection des membres du Parlement européen au suffrage universel direct – Conditions d’éligibilité – Exigence de versement d’un dépôt de garantie électoral – Présentation de candidatures non-sérieuses ou fantaisistes – Objectif de dissuasion – Représentativité de l’électorat – Proportionnalité du montant de ce dépôt de garantie au regard des objectifs poursuivis.#Affaire C-438/24.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0197
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#A. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Zielonej Górze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Directive 2008/7/EC – Indirect taxes on the raising of capital – Conversion of a partnership operating for profit into another partnership operating for profit – Article 2(2) – Certain entities deemed to be capital companies – Article 9 – Option for Member States to derogate from regarding certain entities as equivalent to capital companies – Scope – Article 5(1)(a) and Article 7(1) – Concept of ‘capital duty’ – Article 3 – Presence of a contribution of capital.#Case C-197/25.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0437
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#FT v Nachalnik Oblasten otdel „Avtomobilna administratsia“ - Gabrovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 – Articles 27 and 41 – Use of a driver card belonging to another person – Penalty – Flat-rate fine – No possibility of individualisation – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-437/25.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0266
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I-Sete - Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda. v EDIA- Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Procedures for review of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 2(3) and (5) – Precontractual remedy – Guarantee of an effective remedy – Automatic suspensive effect on procurement procedures – Provisional lifting of suspensive effects – Role of the national court deciding on interim measures – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Interim judicial protection.#Case C-266/25.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0139
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#Administración General del Estado v Ishares Europe EFT.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by an investment fund – Tax rate – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident investment funds – Bilateral tax convention for the avoidance of double taxation – Neutralisation of a possible restriction on the free movement of capital by means of the convention.#Case C-139/25.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0438
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#Erakond Eestimaa Rohelised v Vabariigi Valimiskomisjon and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 17(1), Article 39 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Democratic principle – Right to stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament – Limitation on the exercise of that right – Act concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage – Conditions of eligibility – Requirement to pay an electoral deposit – Presentation of non-serious or frivolous nominations for registration – Objective of discouragement – Representativeness of the electorate – Proportionality of the amount of that deposit having regard to the objectives pursued.#Case C-438/24.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0657
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#Kyberg Pharma Vertriebs-GmbH v Schutzverband gegen Unwesen in der Wirtschaft eV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 – Nutrition and health claims made on foods – Article 10(2) – Specific conditions applicable to health claims – Mandatory information – Statement indicating the importance of a varied and balanced diet and a healthy lifestyle – Placement – Concepts of ‘labelling’ and ‘advertising’ – Food supplement advertised in the written press.#Case C-657/24.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0876
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0721
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#Vista-Life Pharma SA and Vista-Life Pharma Belgium SCRL v Laboratoires S.M.B. SA and Brussels Reps Pharma SRL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 – Nutrition and health claims made on foods – Article 2(2)(5) – Concept of ‘health claim’ – Food supplement – Statements relating to the frequency of intake and/or the route of administration – Article 14(2) – Reduction of disease risk claims – Applicable conditions – Advertising promoting a food supplement.#Case C-721/24.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0223
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#BT and CY v Finanzamt Siegburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Income tax – Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the free movement of persons – Equal treatment – Nationality – Residence – Tax advantages – Deductibility of certain expenses incurred by the taxpayer in relation to his or her household – Restriction to expenditure relating to households situated in a Member State or in a State party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Justification.#Case C-223/25.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0722
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#SIA „Elektro bizness” v Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Point 41 of Article 2 – Concepts of ‘direct line’, ‘isolated generation site’ and ‘isolated customer’ – Article 7 – Conditions for authorising a ‘direct line’ – Article 9 – Public service obligations imposed on electricity undertakings – Connection of a new customer to an electricity line linked to a producer – Maintenance of a back-up connection to the operator’s distribution system.#Case C-722/24.17 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62022TO0083
Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Selimfiber Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trademark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark SPETRA – Earlier non-registered national word mark SPETRA – Earlier non-registered national figurative mark SPETRA – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-83/22.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0509
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FITNESS – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-509/25.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0566
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Worldwide Machinery Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Proceedings for the assignment of the EU trade mark – EU figurative mark SUPERIOR MANUFACTURING – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Concept of ‘agent or representative’ – Rejection of the request for assignment – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-566/25.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0459
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Roman Trotsenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Duty to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality.#Case T-459/24.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0467
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Absara Industrial, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark KROMAT – Earlier EU word mark CROMA – Technical issue during the production of evidence by one of the parties – Reopening of the proceedings – Audi alteram partem rule – Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Probative value of the evidence of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-467/25.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0460
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Polina Sergeevna Gagarina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support of actions which undermine the territorial integrity of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Duty to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Freedom of expression and freedom of the arts.#Case T-460/24.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0287
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#EB v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB Staff – Short-term contract – Termination before appointment has been taken up – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Notice period.#Case T-287/24.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0827
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Cobra Golf Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark ULTRADRY – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-827/25.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0890
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Fitmart Gmbh & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ULTRAPURE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article (7)(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-890/25.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0885
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Sudex OÜ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Remington SYNERGY WORLD – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-885/25.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0060
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Fissore Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Fissore – Earlier EU figurative mark CristianoFissore – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No peaceful coexistence between the marks at issue – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-60/25.16 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0798_RES
Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 3 septembre 2026.#A et autres contre Latvijas Republikas Saeima.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Article 5 – Principes relatifs au traitement des données à caractère personnel – Article 6 – Licéité du traitement – Droit des sociétés – Directive (UE) 2017/1132 – Article 14 – Actes et indications soumis à publicité – Notion de “personnes participant à l’administration, à la surveillance ou au contrôle d’une société” – Mise à la disposition du public de données à caractère personnel relatives aux actionnaires de sociétés anonymes – Actionnaires minoritaires.#Affaire C-798/24.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0147_RES
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 3 septembre 2026.#« Inter Rao Lietuva » AB contre Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Décision 2014/145/PESC – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Mesures restrictives eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Mesure nationale prévoyant un gel des fonds et des ressources économiques appartenant à une personne morale en raison de l’existence d’un lien avec une personne sanctionnée par l’Union européenne – Principe de bonne administration – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Étendue du contrôle juridictionnel – Niveau de la preuve du lien avec la personne sanctionnée.#Affaire C-147/25.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0606_RES
Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 3 septembre 2026.#XY e.a. contre Ministerul Finanţelor.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 19, paragraphe 1, second alinéa, TUE – Article 47 de la Charte des droits fondamentaux – Protection juridictionnelle effective – Indépendance des juges – Tribunal préalablement établi par la loi – Obligation des juridictions nationales de saisir la juridiction suprême d’une question de droit préalable – Article 267 TFUE.#Affaire C-606/24.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0319_RES
A Bíróság ítélete (ötödik tanács), 2026. szeptember 3.#Európai Bizottság kontra Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical Co. Ltd és társai.#Fellebbezés – Dömping – (EU) 2020/1336 végrehajtási rendelet – Kínából származó egyes polivinil‑alkoholok behozatala – Végleges dömpingellenes vám – (EU) 2016/1036 rendelet – A 2. cikk (6a) bekezdése – A rendes érték képzése az exportáló országban fennálló jelentős torzulások miatt – A 2. cikk (10) bekezdése – Az exportár és a rendes érték ugyanazon kereskedelmi szinten történő tisztességes összehasonlítása – »Gyártelepi« szint – Az exportárak vagy a rendes érték kiigazításai – A gyártelepi szint után felmerült költségek – Vissza nem térítendő hozzáadottérték‑adó (héa) – Jutalékalapon dolgozó ügynök feladataihoz hasonló feladatokat ellátó kereskedő – Bizonyítási teher – Az észszerűtlen bizonyítási teher előírásának tilalma – 18. cikk – Az együttműködés hiánya – A rendes érték meghatározásának lehetetlensége – Rendelkezésre álló adatok – Arra vonatkozó döntés, hogy a vizsgálat során együttműködő többi exportáló gyártó legmagasabb rendes értékeit használják fel rendelkezésre álló adatokként – Az Európai Bizottság mérlegelési mozgástere.#C-319/24 P. sz. ügy.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0498
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#Çolakoğlu Metalurji AŞ and Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret AŞ v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 – Imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Comparison between the export price and the normal value – Adjustments – Article 2(10)(i) – Commissions – Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Single economic entity – Criteria – Rules of evidence – Article 2(10)(j) – Conversion of currencies – Exchange rate applicable – Foreign currency risk hedging contract.#Case C-498/24 P.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0598
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#CY v Gândul Media Network SRL and HO.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2001/29/EC – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Reproduction right – Article 2(a) – Concept of a ‘work’ – Short text posted on a social network and reproduced in the online press – Article 5 – Exceptions and limitations – Article 5(3)(c) – Reporting of current events – Degree of harmonisation – Article 5(5) – Three-stage test.#Case C-598/24.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0319
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#European Commission v Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical Co. Ltd and Others.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 – Imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 2(6a) – Construction of the normal value due to significant distortions in the exporting country – Article 2(10) – Fair comparison between the export price and the normal value at the same level of trade – ‘Ex-factory’ level – Adjustments to the export prices or the normal value – Costs incurred after the ex-factory level – Non-refundable value added tax (VAT) – Trader carrying out functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Burden of proof – Prohibition on imposing an unreasonable burden of proof – Article 18 – Non-cooperation – Impossibility of determining the normal value – Facts available – Decision to use, as facts available, the highest normal values of the other exporting producers that cooperated in the investigation – Margin of discretion of the European Commission.#Case C-319/24 P.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0147
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#« Inter Rao Lietuva » AB v Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1) – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – National measure providing for the freezing of funds and economic resources belonging to a legal person owing to the existence of links with a person sanctioned by the European Union – Principle of good administration – Right to effective legal protection – Scope of judicial review – Standard of proof of the links with the sanctioned person.#Case C-147/25.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0653
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri v Regione Emilia-Romagna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 2(1) – Scope – Article 4(1) – Concept of ‘service’ – Selection from among several candidates – Article 12(1) and (2) – Concessions of small-scale hydroelectric diversions and related power plants – National legislation providing for the automatic renewal of concessions granted – Article 49 TFUE.#Case C-653/24.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0499
Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 3 septembre 2026.#Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ e.a. contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Dumping – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2021/1100 – Importations de certains produits plats laminés à chaud en fer, en aciers non alliés ou en autres aciers alliés, originaires de Turquie – Droit antidumping définitif – Calcul de la valeur normale – Comparaison équitable – Règlement (UE) 2016/1036 – Article 2, paragraphe 5 – Article 2, paragraphe 10, sous j) – Ajustements – Conversion de monnaies – Couverture des gains et des pertes – Article 18, paragraphes 3 et 6 – Coopération des intéressés.#Affaire C-499/24 P.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0798
Tiesas spriedums (pirmā palāta), 2026. gada 3. septembris.#A et autres pret Latvijas Republikas Saeima.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Fizisko personu aizsardzība attiecībā uz personas datu apstrādi – Regula (ES) 2016/679 – 5. pants – Personas datu apstrādes principi – 6. pants – Apstrādes likumīgums – Sabiedrību tiesības – Direktīva (ES) 2017/1132 – 14. pants – Dokumenti un ziņas, kas sabiedrībām ir jānodod atklātībā – Jēdziens “personas, kas piedalās sabiedrības pārvaldē, uzraudzībā vai kontrolē” – Akciju sabiedrību akcionāru personas datu nodošana atklātībā – Mazākuma akcionāri.#Lieta C-798/24.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0606
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#XY and Others v Ministerul Finanţelor.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective legal protection – Judicial independence – Tribunal previously established by law – Obligation of the national courts to refer a preliminary point of law to the supreme court – Article 267 TFEU.#Case C-606/24.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0060
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#SR v FT SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101(2) TFEU – Automatic nullity of agreements prohibited under Article 101 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 16(1) – European Commission decisions finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Binding effect of those decisions on a national court or tribunal – Single and continuous infringement in the Euro Interest Rate Derivatives sector – Agreements and concerted practices having as their object the distortion of the normal course of pricing components in that sector – Dispute between a borrower and the funding bank concerning the validity of an interest rate referring to Euribor.#Case C-60/25.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0145
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#BdM Banca SpA, anciennement Banca Popolare di Bari SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid granted by national authorities to a banking institution – Commission decision declaring the measure as State aid incompatible with the internal market – Unlawfulness of that decision – Action for damages – Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU – Limitation period – Rule of EU law intended to confer rights on individuals – Sufficiently serious breach – Causal link.#Case C-145/24 P.3 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0835
Urteil des Gerichts (Zweite Kammer) vom 2. September 2026.#Olymp Bezner KG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung einer Unionsbildmarke, die die Kombination der drei Farben Weiß, Dunkelblau und Blau darstellt – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Fehlende Unterscheidungskraft – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Begründungspflicht – Art. 94 der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Gleichbehandlung.#Rechtssache T-835/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0681
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Health Labs Care S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark HealthLabs PHARM – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark – Earlier national company name Health Labs Care Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka komandytowa – Likelihood of confusion.#Case T-681/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0834
Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Olymp Bezner KG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne consistant en la combinaison des trois couleurs blanc, bleu foncé et bleu – Motif absolu de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Obligation de motivation – Article 94 du règlement 2017/1001 – Égalité de traitement.#Affaire T-834/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0799
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefitting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-799/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0635
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Health Labs Care S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark NPhealthLABS+ – Earlier national company name Health Labs – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent mark – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of signs – Distinctiveness – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Rejection of the opposition.#Case T-635/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0675
Sentencia del Tribunal General (Sala Primera) de 2 de septiembre de 2026.#Royal contra Oficina de Propiedad Intelectual de la Unión Europea.#Marca de la Unión Europea — Solicitud de marca figurativa de la Unión ROYAL — Motivos de denegación absolutos — Falta de carácter distintivo — Artículo 7, apartado 1, letra b), del Reglamento (UE) 2017/1001 — Falta de carácter distintivo adquirido por el uso — Artículo 7, apartado 3, del Reglamento 2017/1001.#Asunto T-675/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0658
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Warbud S.A. v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Public works contracts – Tendering procedure – Design and construction of Frontex permanent premises – Rejection of a tenderer’s tender – Action for annulment – Act open to challenge – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Abnormally low tender.#Case T-658/24.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0678
Sentencia del Tribunal General (Sala Segunda) de 2 de septiembre de 2026.#Jaime García Ávila contra Oficina de Propiedad Intelectual de la Unión Europea.#Marca de la Unión Europea — Procedimiento de nulidad — Marca tridimensional de la Unión — Forma de una botella azul con elementos denominativos — Marca nacional figurativa anterior 1890 ESPECIAL EXÓTICA GIN PREMIUM — Causa de nulidad absoluta — Ausencia de mala fe — Artículo 59, apartado 1, letra b), del reglamento (UE) 2017/1001 — Causa de nulidad relativa — Inexistencia de riesgo de confusión — Artículo 8, apartado 1, letra b), del Reglamento 2017/1001.#Asunto T-678/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0376
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Design representing a footwear sole – Prior EU designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of attention of an informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-376/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0120_RES
Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre élargie) du 2 septembre 2026.#Global Legal Action Network et Climate Action Network Europe (CAN-Europe) contre Commission européenne.#Environnement – Règlement (UE) 2018/842 – Réductions annuelles des émissions de GES – Révision des quotas annuels d’émissions de GES des États membres pour la période 2023-2030 – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2023/1319 – Rejet de la demande de réexamen interne – Article 10, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CE) no 1367/2006 – Convention d’Aarhus – Motifs de réexamen dirigés contre les règlements (UE) 2021/1119 et (UE) 2023/857 fixant les objectifs de réduction des émissions de GES de l’Union pour 2030 – Pouvoir d’exécution de la Commission – Article 291, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Motifs de réexamen dirigés contre une analyse d’impact – Initiative législative.#Affaire T-120/24.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0430
Urteil des Gerichts (Siebte Kammer) vom 2. September 2026.#Christoph Klein gegen Europäische Kommission.#Außervertragliche Haftung – Öffentliches Gesundheitswesen – Rechtsrahmen der Union für Medizinprodukte – Schutzklausel – Art. 8 Abs. 1 und 2 der Richtlinie 93/42/EWG – Mitteilung eines Mitgliedstaats über eine Entscheidung, mit der das Inverkehrbringen eines Medizinprodukts verboten wird – Anhaltendes Versäumnis der Kommission, tätig zu werden – Medizinprodukt ‚Inhaler Broncho-Air®‘ – Aufhebung der Richtlinie 93/42 – Art. 94 bis 97 der Verordnung (EU) 2017/745 – Art. 41 der Charta der Grundrechte – Tatsächlicher und sicherer Schaden.#Rechtssache T-430/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0521
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#RGCC Holdings AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative trade mark PHI GROUP – International registration of the earlier figurative mark PHIACADEMY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-521/24.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0357_RES
Acórdão do Tribunal Geral (Oitava Secção alargada) de 2 de setembro de 2026.#Opera Norway AS contra Comissão Europeia.#Serviços digitais — Regulamento (UE) 2022/1925 — Designação de um controlador de acesso — Navegador Web — Artigo 3.°, n.os 2 e 5, do Regulamento 2022/1925 — Porta de acesso importante para os utilizadores profissionais chegarem aos seus utilizadores finais — Presunção — Artigo 17.°, n.° 3, do Regulamento 2022/1925 — Investigação de mercado para fins de designação de controladores de acesso — Recurso de anulação — Afetação individual — Admissibilidade — Dever de fundamentação — Erro de direito — Erro de apreciação — Princípio da boa administração.#Processo T-357/24.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0632
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Xaipix sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Aipix – Earlier international word mark VAPIX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-632/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0012
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Generic medicinal products – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Degarelix Accord – degarelix acetate – Lack of bioequivalence study with the reference medicinal product – Article 10(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/83/EC – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of good administration.#Case T-12/24.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0175
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Özkan Demir Çelik Sanayi AŞ v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of steel bulb flats originating in China and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/209 – Article 2(10)(j) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Currency conversions – Article 2(4), (10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Ordinary course of trade – Fair comparison between the export price and the normal value – Quarterly dumping margin calculation).#Case T-175/24.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0049
Sentencia del Tribunal General (Sala Primera) de 2 de septiembre de 2026.#Stratio Big Data Inc. contra Oficina de Propiedad Intelectual de la Unión Europea.#Marca de la Unión Europea — Procedimiento de caducidad — Marca denominativa de la Unión stratio — Incidente técnico en la presentación por una de las partes de pruebas y de sus traducciones — Falta de transmisión por la EUIPO de determinadas traducciones a la otra parte — Derecho de defensa — Principio de contradicción — Artículo 94, apartado 1, segunda frase, del Reglamento (UE) 2017/1001.#Asunto T-49/24.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0481
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#World 2 Meet Travel SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark newblue – Earlier EU word marks JETBLUE and BYBLUE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-481/25.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0296
Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Igor Albertovich Kesaev contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Notion de “femme ou homme d’affaires ayant une activité dans des secteurs économiques qui fournissent une source substantielle de revenus au gouvernement de la Fédération de Russie” – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous g), du règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Exception d’illégalité – Erreur d’appréciation – Proportionnalité – Sécurité juridique – Égalité de traitement.#Affaire T-296/24.2 September 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0416
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#ES v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AD/03/22 (AD 5) – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Principle of good administration – Duty of diligence and duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-416/24.2 September 2026