Court cases
Showing 2026. Clear filters
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0336(01)
Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 25 août 2026.#Protection Unit contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Marchés publics de services – Demande de sursis à exécution et de mesures provisoires – Fumus boni juris – Urgence – Mise en balance des intérêts.#Affaire T-336/26 R.25 August 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0410
__[no-tr-for:ord-t]__ of 14 August 2026.#UM v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-410/26 R.14 August 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0310
Order of the President of the General Court of 12 August 2026.#TB v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Application for interim measures – Civil service – Member of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Termination of the contract – Application for suspension of operation and interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-310/26 R.12 August 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0294
Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 11 août 2026.#SX contre Parlement européen.#Référé – Réglementation concernant les frais et indemnités des députés au Parlement – Indemnité d’assistance parlementaire – Recouvrement des sommes indûment versées – Demande de sursis à exécution – Défaut d’urgence.#Affaire T-294/26 R.11 August 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TO0688
Определение на Общия съд (трети състав) от 6 август 2026 г.#Albos-Energy EOOD срещу Европейска комисия.#Иск за установяване на неправомерно бездействие — Държавни помощи — Българска схема за подпомагане на производството на енергия от възобновяеми източници — Информация, предоставена в жалба, третирана като обща пазарна информация — Заобикаляне на изтичането на срока за подаване на жалба за отмяна — Недопустимост.#Дело T-688/25.6 August 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0267
Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 4 août 2026.#Christoph Klein contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Clause de sauvegarde – Dispositif médical – Demande de sursis à exécution – Demande de mesures provisoires – Défaut d’urgence.#Affaire T-267/26 R.4 August 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TO0001
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 August 2026.#Kartroi LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Proceedings – Taxation of costs.#Joined Cases T-1/24 DEP and T-47/24 DEP.3 August 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0280(01)
Order of the President of the General Court of 3 August 2026.#Broadcom Inc. and VMware International Unlimited Company v European Commission.#Interim relief – Competition – Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Request for information – Application for suspension of operation of a measure and for interim measures – No need to adjudicate in part – No prima facie case – Weighing up of competing interests.#Case T-280/26 R.3 August 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0272
Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 22 juillet 2026.#Marek Lovás contre Parquet européen.#Référé – Rejet du recours principal – Non-lieu à statuer.#Affaire T-272/26 R.22 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0017
Order of the President of the General Court of 22 July 2026.#Indra Sistemas, SA v European External Action Service.#Interim measures – Public procurement – Negotiated tender procedure – Sole tenderer – Rejection of the tender – Application for suspension of operation and interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-17/26 R.22 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CO0790
Ordonnance de rectification du 20 juillet 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) contre Commission européenne.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaire C-790/24 P.20 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0335
Order of the President of the General Court of 20 July 2026.#Goldwind Science & Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Interim relief – Regulation (EU) 2022/2560 – Foreign subsidies – Request for information – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Lack of urgency.#Case T-335/26 R.20 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TO0116(01)
Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 17 juillet 2026.#DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Politique économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Règlement (UE) no 806/2014 – Exigence minimale de fonds propres et d’engagements éligibles – Décision du comité d’appel du CRU concernant la fixation d’exigences minimales de fonds propres et d’engagements éligibles – Demande de réformation – Irrecevabilité manifeste partielle – Article 85, paragraphe 3, du règlement no 806/2014 – Incompétence de l’auteur de l’acte – Recours en partie manifestement fondé.#Affaire T-116/24.17 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0024
Ordonnance du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 17 juillet 2026.#Alfio Cerami contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Article 76, sous d), du règlement de procédure – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Recours manifestement irrecevable – Demande d’aide juridictionnelle.#Affaire T-24/26.17 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0401_SUM
Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA contre Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Réseaux et services de communications électroniques – Directive 2002/21/CE – Article 9 – Gestion des radiofréquences pour les services de communications électroniques – Principe de neutralité à l’égard des services – Article 9 bis – Réexamen des restrictions aux droits d’utilisation des radiofréquences existants – Mesure nationale imposant à un titulaire de droits d’utilisation de radiofréquences d’utiliser ces radiofréquences conformément aux dispositions du plan national d’attribution des fréquences et ne permettant pas d’exercer des activités différentes – Mesure nationale imposant d’utiliser lesdites radiofréquences exclusivement pour des services de diffusion de télévision numérique terrestre.#Affaire C-401/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026CO0067_INF
Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Napag Italia S.r.l. contre Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Regionale del Lazio.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Absence de mise en œuvre du droit de l’Union – Incompétence manifeste de la Cour.#Affaire C-67/26.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0789_INF
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Réglementation financière de l’Union – Exécution du budget de l’Union européenne en gestion indirecte par une organisation internationale – Décision refusant à une entité la reconnaissance du statut d’organisation internationale – Préjudice matériel – Perte de chance de conclure avec la Commission européenne des conventions de délégation selon le mode de la gestion indirecte en qualité d’organisation internationale et de percevoir une contribution visant à couvrir les frais administratifs induits – Lien de causalité – Réalité et étendue du préjudice.#Affaire C-789/24 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TO0839_INF
Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Team Beverage AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale TEAM – Cause de nullité absolue – Procédure devant la division d’annulation – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-839/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026CO0067
Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Napag Italia S.r.l. contre Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Regionale del Lazio.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Absence de mise en œuvre du droit de l’Union – Incompétence manifeste de la Cour.#Affaire C-67/26.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CO0358
Postanowienie Trybunału (ósma izba) z dnia 16 lipca 2026 r.#M.O. przeciwko Skarb Państwa - Prezes Sądu Rejonowego dla m. st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Artykuł 53 § 2 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem – Dyrektywa (UE) 2017/1132 – Ujawnienie i aktualizacja informacji dotyczących spółek – Zaprzestanie pełnienia funkcji przez członków zarządu – Fundacja – Brak możliwości zastosowania – Artykuł 47 Karty praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej – Brak zastosowania prawa Unii – Oczywista niedopuszczalność.#Sprawa C-358/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0523_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Sociedad Civil Catalana, Asociación Cívica y Cultural (SCC) and Ministerio Fiscal v RAS and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Effective judicial protection in matters covered by EU law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Accounting liability proceedings – Pursuit of the independence of part of the national territory of a Member State – National amnesty law concerning acts giving rise to liability in respect of public funds – Extinction of liability within a maximum period of two months, without examination of the defence submissions and exculpatory evidence and without hearing all the parties to the proceedings – First paragraph of Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU.#Case C-523/24.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0027_RES
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#SU and Others v An Coimisiún Pleanála, anciennement An Bord Pleanála and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special protection areas – Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project likely to have an effect on a protected site in view of that site’s conservation objectives – Screening – Conservation objectives specific to a special protection area not set.#Joined Cases C-27/25 and C-356/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0209_RES
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#FT and RRC Sports GmbH v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Competition – Professional football – Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) Football Agent Regulations – Rules on agents’ remuneration, agent licences, multiple representation, making an approach and the communication of certain information to FIFA, other agents, clubs and players – Article 101(1) TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices – Restrictions on competition – Concepts of anticompetitive ‘object’ and ‘effect’ – Exception to the prohibition laid down in Article 101(1) TFEU – Conditions – Exemption under Article 101(3) TFEU – Conditions – Concept of ‘efficiency gains’ – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Justification – Conditions – Article 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom to provide services – Objectives – Proportionality – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Lawfulness of processing.#Case C-209/23.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0280_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Criminal proceedings against M.G.D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union – Concept – Limitation period for criminal liability – National standard of protection relating to the principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior principle) – Obligation for the courts of a Member State to disapply case-law of the supreme court of that Member State which is not in line with EU law – Application of the judgment of 24 July 2023, Lin (C‑107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606) – Constitutional prohibition on applying lex tertia – Limitation period already expired – Foreseeability of the conditions laid down by that judgment – Compatibility of that judgment with Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950.#Case C-280/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0666_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Criminal proceedings against EGB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating terrorism – Article 83(1) TFEU – Directive (EU) 2017/541 – Article 3 – Terrorist offences – Article 4 – Offences relating to a terrorist group – Article 15(1) – Obligation to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties – Effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Primacy of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation – National amnesty law which provides for the extinction of criminal liability – Acts which have not intentionally caused serious breaches of human rights.#Case C-666/24.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0748_RES
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#C. Limited v M. S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – National legislation permitting a review of compliance with the requirements of independence and impartiality of a judge sitting in the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Composition of the panel of judges called upon to review compliance with those requirements – Irregularities in the appointment of a member of the panel – Consequences of such irregularities – Impartiality – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-748/23.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0258_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#References for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of a dominant position – Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Implementation by the national competition authorities – Decision of a national competition authority ordering an inspection – Search of the premises of the undertakings concerned – Seizure of business records resulting from email communications – Warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private life and communications – Right to the protection of personal data – Procedural requirements – No prior authorisation by a court.#Joined Cases C-258/23 to C-260/23.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0424_RES
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#ZD and MI v Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary sanctions in the area of sport – Temporary prohibition on the pursuit of certain professional activities, imposed by a national sports association on two directors of a professional football club – Infringement consisting in making or approving false financial and accounting statements – Internal market – Articles 45 and 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom of movement for workers and the freedom to provide services – Whether justified – Legitimate objective in the public interest – Proper conduct of sporting competitions – Observance of the principle of proportionality – Determination of sanctions – Existence of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory, proportionate and verifiable criteria – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether there is effective judicial review – National legislation allowing the court having jurisdiction over the indirect review of the lawfulness of those sanctions to award compensation to the persons subject to sanctions but not to annul or suspend those sanctions.#Joined Cases C-424/24 and C-425/24.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0559_RES
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Appeal – Non-contractual liability – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) investigations – Confidentiality – Non-authorised disclosure of the investigation report to the press – Imputability of the leaks – Article 10(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Material and non-material damage – Burden of proof – Limitation period for actions for damages – First paragraph of Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Confidentiality of legal opinions.#Case C-559/23 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0196_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#xx v ww and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation between the courts of Member States in civil or commercial matters – Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 – Article 12(2) – Request made to the requested court for the execution of a measure of inquiry adopted by the requesting court – Grounds for refusal to execute such a request – Rule of substantive law of the requested Member State – Taking of the evidence considered to be contrary to the fundamental principles of the law of the requested Member State – Exhumation of a body for the purpose of establishing parentage – Post-mortem genetic testing – Articles 1 and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for human dignity – Right to know one’s genetic origins.#Case C-196/24.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0039
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Decision 2012/642/CFSP – Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to and transit through the territory of the European Union – Inclusion and maintenance of the appellant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned by the restrictive measures – Criterion relating to benefiting from or supporting the regime of President Lukashenko.#Case C-39/25 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0133
Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Pension d’ancienneté – Conditions d’octroi – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Durée minimale de service – Absences injustifiées ou irrégulières – Article 59, paragraphe 3 – Article 60 – Imputation des absences irrégulières ou injustifiées sur la durée du congé annuel – Conséquences en cas d’épuisement dudit congé – Perte du bénéfice de la rémunération pour la période correspondant aux absences irrégulières ou injustifiées – Privation de plein droit du bénéfice de l’acquisition de droits à pension d’ancienneté pour la période concernée.#Affaire C-133/25 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0169
Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Procédure disciplinaire – Révocation – Retrait de la décision de révocation pour vice de procédure – Nouvelle révocation – Composition du Tribunal de l’Union européenne – Prétendue absence d’impartialité – Offres de preuves – Actes frauduleux – Effets du retrait d’une décision – Réintégration du fonctionnaire sans son consentement – Composition de l’autorité investie du pouvoir de nomination – Prétendue absence d’impartialité.#Affaire C-169/25 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0401
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/21/EC – Article 9 – Radio spectrum management for electronic communications services – Principle of service neutrality – Article 9a – Review of restrictions on existing rights to use radio spectrum – A national measure requiring a holder of rights to use radio frequencies to use those frequencies in accordance with the provisions of the national frequency allocation plan and not permitting the pursuit of different activities – A national measure requiring the use of those radio frequencies exclusively for digital terrestrial television broadcasting services.#Case C-401/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0363
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Dana Astra IOOO v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Criterion for inclusion on those lists relating to the benefit derived from or the support provided to the Lukashenko regime – Maintenance of the appellant’s name on those lists – Belarusian company active in the property development and construction sector – Grounds for maintaining the listing – Sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Point from which time starts to run – Notification of the restrictive measures at issue to the appellant’s lawyers – Inadmissibility of the action on the ground that it was brought out of time – Examination of the merits of the action for reasons relating to the sound administration of justice – Plea in law alleging errors of assessment vitiating the grounds for maintaining the listing.#Case C-363/25 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0280
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea v M.G.D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union – Concept – Limitation period for criminal liability – National standard of protection relating to the principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior principle) – Obligation for the courts of a Member State to disapply case-law of the supreme court of that Member State which is not in line with EU law – Application of the judgment of 24 July 2023, Lin (C‑107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606) – Constitutional prohibition on applying lex tertia – Limitation period already expired – Foreseeability of the conditions laid down by that judgment – Compatibility of that judgment with Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950.#Case C-280/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0258
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#References for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of a dominant position – Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Implementation by the national competition authorities – Decision of a national competition authority ordering an inspection – Search of the premises of the undertakings concerned – Seizure of business records resulting from email communications – Warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private life and communications – Right to the protection of personal data – Procedural requirements – No prior authorisation by a court.#Joined Cases C-258/23 to C-260/23.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0400
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(b) and Article 2(1)(d) – Restrictive measures taken against a natural person providing financial support to Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea or the destabilisation of Ukraine – Article 21 TFEU – Article 45(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Restrictive measures affecting the freedom of movement and residence of an EU citizen.#Case C-400/25 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0399
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1) in fine and Article 2(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Definition of ‘association’ in the case of two persons bound by a family relationship – Article 21 TFEU – Article 45(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Restrictive measures affecting the freedom of movement and residence of an EU citizen.#Case C-399/25 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0158
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#QJ v Administration de l'enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVA and État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether applicable – National legislation providing for a system of joint and several liability of company directors for payment of value added tax (VAT) owed by the company – Binding effect of the findings of fact and legal classifications contained in a final tax assessment – Option for the director to challenge the assessment issued against the company as an incidental question – Respect for the rights of the defence.#Case C-158/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0026
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#PQ v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Article 20 TFEU – Family member of a Union citizen who has never exercised his or her right of freedom of movement – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Threat to national security – Statement by a specialist national authority – Statement of reasons – Access to the file – Classified information – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-26/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0051
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Betaal Garant Nederland CV v De Nederlandsche Bank NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive (EU) 2015/2366 – Article 4(3) – Concept of a ‘payment service’ – Article 4(24) – Concept of ‘credit transfer’ – Transaction by an intermediary entity carried out under a tripartite agreement and consisting in the holding of client funds in a bank account of that intermediary entity and the transfer of those funds to a business owner, following the client’s authorisation – Classification of the transaction – Absence of a ‘payment service’.#Case C-51/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025CJ0027
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#SU and Wild Ireland Defence CLG v An Coimisiún Pleanála, anciennement An Bord Pleanála and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special protection areas – Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project likely to have an effect on a protected site in view of that site’s conservation objectives – Screening – Conservation objectives specific to a special protection area not set.#Case C-27/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TO0839
Beschluss des Gerichts (Sechste Kammer) vom 16. Juli 2026.#Team Beverage AG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Nichtigkeitsverfahren – Unionswortmarke TEAM – Absoluter Nichtigkeitsgrund – Verfahren vor der Nichtigkeitsabteilung – Klage, der offensichtlich jede rechtliche Grundlage fehlt.#Rechtssache T-839/25.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026TO0283
Ordonanța Tribunalului din din 16 iulie 2026.#SG împotriva Parlamentul European.#Măsuri provizorii – Drept instituțional – Membru al Parlamentului – Privilegii și imunități – Decizie de ridicare în parte a imunității parlamentare – Cerere de suspendare a executării – Lipsa fumus boni iuris.#Cauza T-283/26 R.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0789
Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Réglementation financière de l’Union – Exécution du budget de l’Union européenne en gestion indirecte par une organisation internationale – Décision refusant à une entité la reconnaissance du statut d’organisation internationale – Préjudice matériel – Perte de chance de conclure avec la Commission européenne des conventions de délégation selon le mode de la gestion indirecte en qualité d’organisation internationale et de percevoir une contribution visant à couvrir les frais administratifs induits – Lien de causalité – Réalité et étendue du préjudice.#Affaire C-789/24 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0666
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Ministerio Fiscal and Others v EGB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating terrorism – Article 83(1) TFEU – Directive (EU) 2017/541 – Article 3 – Terrorist offences – Article 4 – Offences relating to a terrorist group – Article 15(1) – Obligation to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties – Effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Primacy of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation – National amnesty law which provides for the extinction of criminal liability – Acts which have not intentionally caused serious breaches of human rights.#Case C-666/24.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0421
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v Google Ireland Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2000/31/EC – Article 1(5) – Scope – Exclusion of gambling activities – Advertising of gambling – Hosting such advertising – Article 14 – Liability regime for hosting service providers – Active role – Commercial contract concluded between a hosting service provider and a recipient of the service.#Case C-421/24.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0748
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (čtvrtého senátu) ze dne 16. července 2026.#C. Limited v. M. S.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Právní stát – Nezávislost soudců – Článek 19 odst. 1 druhý pododstavec SEU – Článek 47 Listiny základních práv Evropské unie – Vnitrostátní právní úprava umožňující ověřit dodržení požadavků na nezávislost a nestrannost soudce působícího u Nejvyššího soudu (Sąd Najwyższy, Polsko) – Složení soudního kolegia pověřeného přezkoumáním dodržení těchto požadavků – Vada podmínek jmenování člena takového kolegia – Důsledky vyplývající z této vady – Nestrannost – Přednost unijního práva.#Věc C-748/23.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0523
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Sociedad Civil Catalana, Asociación Cívica y Cultural (SCC) and Ministerio Fiscal v RAS and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Effective judicial protection in matters covered by EU law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Accounting liability proceedings – Pursuit of the independence of part of the national territory of a Member State – National amnesty law concerning acts giving rise to liability in respect of public funds – Extinction of liability within a maximum period of two months, without examination of the defence submissions and exculpatory evidence and without hearing all the parties to the proceedings – First paragraph of Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU.#Case C-523/24.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0559
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Appeal – Non-contractual liability – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) investigations – Confidentiality – Non-authorised disclosure of the investigation report to the press – Imputability of the leaks – Article 10(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Material and non-material damage – Burden of proof – Limitation period for actions for damages – First paragraph of Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Confidentiality of legal opinions.#Case C-559/23 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0096
Presuda Suda (četvrto vijeće) od 16. srpnja 2026.#X.Y. i dr.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Vladavina prava – Neovisnost sudaca – Članak 19. stavak 1. drugi podstavak UEU-a – Članak 47. Povelje Europske unije o temeljnim pravima – Nacionalni propis na temelju kojeg se može provjeriti poštuje li sudac koji obnaša dužnost na Sądu Najwyższyjem (Vrhovni sud, Poljska) zahtjeve neovisnosti i nepristranosti – Sastav suda od kojeg se traži da provede nadzor poštovanja tih zahtjeva – Nepravilnost uvjeta imenovanja člana takvog sastava – Posljedice koje se mogu izvesti iz te nepravilnosti – Nepristranost – Nadređenost prava Unije.#Spojeni predmeti C-96/24, C-103/24 i C-112/24.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0790
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Appeal – EU Financial Regulations – Implementation of the EU budget under joint or indirect management with an international organisation – Decision refusing to recognise an entity as an international organisation with retroactive effect – Concept of ‘international organisation’ – Constituent elements – Interpretation of the international agreement establishing the organisation – Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – Articles 31 and 32 – Non-contractual liability.#Case C-790/24 P.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0196
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#xx v ww and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation between the courts of Member States in civil or commercial matters – Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 – Article 12(2) – Request made to the requested court for the execution of a measure of inquiry adopted by the requesting court – Grounds for refusal to execute such a request – Rule of substantive law of the requested Member State – Taking of the evidence considered to be contrary to the fundamental principles of the law of the requested Member State – Exhumation of a body for the purpose of establishing parentage – Post-mortem genetic testing – Articles 1 and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for human dignity – Right to know one’s genetic origins.#Case C-196/24.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0424
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#ZD and MI v Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary sanctions in the area of sport – Temporary prohibition on the pursuit of certain professional activities, imposed by a national sports association on two directors of a professional football club – Infringement consisting in making or approving false financial and accounting statements – Internal market – Articles 45 and 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom of movement for workers and the freedom to provide services – Whether justified – Legitimate objective in the public interest – Proper conduct of sporting competitions – Observance of the principle of proportionality – Determination of sanctions – Existence of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory, proportionate and verifiable criteria – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether there is effective judicial review – National legislation allowing the court having jurisdiction over the indirect review of the lawfulness of those sanctions to award compensation to the persons subject to sanctions but not to annul or suspend those sanctions.#Joined Cases C-424/24 and C-425/24.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62023CJ0209
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (πέμπτο τμήμα) της 16ης Ιουλίου 2026.#FT και RRC Sports GmbH κατά Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA).#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Εσωτερική αγορά – Ανταγωνισμός – Επαγγελματικό ποδόσφαιρο – Κανόνες της Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) σχετικά με τους διαμεσολαβητές – Κανόνες σχετικά με την αμοιβή των διαμεσολαβητών, την άδεια άσκησης επαγγέλματος, την πολλαπλή εκπροσώπηση, τις “προσεγγίσεις”, καθώς και την κοινοποίηση ορισμένων στοιχείων στη FIFA, στους λοιπούς διαμεσολαβητές, στους συλλόγους και στους παίκτες – Άρθρο 101, παράγραφος 1, ΣΛΕΕ – Απαγόρευση των συμπράξεων – Συμφωνίες μεταξύ επιχειρήσεων, αποφάσεις ενώσεων επιχειρήσεων και εναρμονισμένες πρακτικές – Περιορισμοί του ανταγωνισμού – Έννοιες του αντιθέτου προς τον ανταγωνισμό “αντικειμένου” και “αποτελέσματος” – Εξαίρεση από την απαγόρευση του άρθρου 101, παράγραφος 1, ΣΛΕΕ – Προϋποθέσεις – Εξαίρεση βάσει του άρθρου 101, παράγραφος 3, ΣΛΕΕ – Προϋποθέσεις – Έννοια της “βελτίωσης της αποτελεσματικότητας” – Άρθρο 102 ΣΛΕΕ – Κατάχρηση δεσπόζουσας θέσης – Δικαιολόγηση – Προϋποθέσεις – Άρθρο 56 ΣΛΕΕ – Εμπόδιο στην ελεύθερη παροχή υπηρεσιών – Σκοποί – Αναλογικότητα – Προστασία των δεδομένων προσωπικού χαρακτήρα – Κανονισμός (ΕΕ) 2016/679 – Άρθρο 6, παράγραφος 1, πρώτο εδάφιο, στοιχείο στʹ – Νομιμότητα της επεξεργασίας – Προϋποθέσεις.#Υπόθεση C-209/23.16 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TO0836
Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Ci Etf I Renato Ptx HoldCo, SL v European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency.#Action for annulment – Arbitration clause – Innovation Fund – Grant agreement – Completion guarantee – Identification of the defendant – Partial inadmissibility.#Case T-836/25.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0555_INF
Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#OpenAI, Inc. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale OPENAI – Motifs absolus de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Égalité de traitement – Principe de bonne administration.#Affaire T-555/25.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0677_INF
Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#Desimo, Lda. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative go VEGE – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale antérieure végé’ – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-677/25.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026CO0013
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Working documents issued by the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union – No publication, in the Council’s register, of documents submitted following a request for access – Article 10 and Article 16(8) TEU – Article 15 TFEU – No implied refusal to publish – No challengeable act – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-13/26 P.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026CO0106
Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#Harouna Douamba contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 168, paragraphe 2, et article 119, paragraphes 2 et 4, du règlement de procédure – Pourvoi manifestement irrecevable – Absence de production d’un document officiel ou d’un mandat dans le délai imparti.#Affaire C-106/26 P.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CO0844
Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#Procureur du Roi près du Tribunal de première instance de Liège, division Liège et État belge, SPF Finances contre ECDC Logistics SA e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, ainsi qu’articles 94 et 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Union douanière – Code des douanes de l’Union – Règlement (UE) no 952/2013 – Importations de marchandises – Valeur en douane – Sous-évaluation – Méthodes secondaires de détermination de la valeur en douane – Méthode fondée sur un prix moyen calculé sur la base de valeurs statistiques agrégées établies à l’échelle de l’Union européenne – Article 53 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Recevabilité.#Affaire C-844/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0492_RES
Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre élargie) du 15 juillet 2026.#Dimitry Aleksandrovich Beloglazov contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Restriction en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Inscription et maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous h), i), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Notion de “personne qui facilite des violations de l’interdiction de contournement” des mesures restrictives – Critère fondé sur un comportement susceptible de constituer une infraction pénale – Champ d’application territorial du règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Sécurité juridique – Proportionnalité – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-492/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0661_RES
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability of the European Union – EAGF and EAFRD – Judgment annulling a Commission decision excluding from EU financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the EAGF and EAFRD – Reimbursement by the Commission of the amount unduly received – Commission’s refusal to pay interest on the excess amount received – Obligation to pay interest – Compensation at a standard rate for the loss of enjoyment of the amount unduly paid to the Commission – Article 266 TFEU – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-661/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0529
Rozsudek Tribunálu (třetího senátu) ze dne 15. července 2026.#Kverulant.org o. p. s. v. Evropský parlament.#Přístup k dokumentům – Nařízení (ES) č. 1049/2001 – Dokumenty týkající se platů a náhrad poslanců zvolených za Českou republiku – Částečné odepření přístupu – Výjimka týkající se ochrany soukromí a osobnosti jednotlivce – Článek 4 odst. 1 písm. b) nařízení č. 1049/2001 – Ochrana osobních údajů – Nezbytnost předání osobních údajů pro konkrétní účel ve veřejném zájmu – Článek 9 odst. 1 nařízení (EU) 2018/1725.#Věc T-529/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0588
Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#OT contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Erreur d’appréciation – Droits de la défense.#Affaire T-588/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0310
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Úsovsko Agro s. r. o. v European Commission.#State aid – Agricultural sector – Aid schemes for large enterprises in the primary agricultural sector in the Czech Republic – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Error of assessment – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – European Union Guidelines for State aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas 2014 to 2020 – Presence of an incentive effect – Proportionality – Ex post consideration of a counterfactual scenario.#Case T-310/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0261
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Restrictive measures against Belarus – Prohibition on the purchase, import or transfer of potash products from Belarus – Prevention of the transit of potash from Belarus via the territory of Lithuania – Application seeking assessment of the legality of a provision that does not provide for restrictive measures against natural or legal persons within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 275 TFEU – Application for a direction to be issued – Partial lack of jurisdiction – Breach of procedural requirements – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – No call to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-261/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0555
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#OpenAI, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark OPENAI – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-555/25.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0677
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Desimo, Lda. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark go VEGE – Earlier EU word mark végé’ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-677/25.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0155
Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#IB contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Fonction publique – Personnel de la BEI – Procédure disciplinaire – Sanction disciplinaire – Blâme – Délégation de pouvoirs – Absence de publication – Incompétence de l’auteur de l’acte.#Affaire T-155/25.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0666
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Teva Pharma BV v European Medicines Agency.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Document from a scientific advice procedure for the medicinal product ferric carboxymaltose – Decision to grant a third party partial access to the document – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests.#Case T-666/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0256
Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#RMC-Consulting Sàrl e.a. contre Parlement européen.#Clause compromissoire – Extension et remise à niveau du bâtiment Konrad Adenauer à Luxembourg – Contrat de services portant sur le suivi de travaux au titre du génie technique – Retard du chantier – Imputabilité – Refus du Parlement de régler certaines factures – Non-lieu à statuer partiel.#Affaire T-256/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0268
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 July 2026.#Sampension Livsforsikring A/S v Skatteministeriet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable persons – VAT group – Concept of ‘persons closely bound to one another by financial, economic and organisational links’ – Measures to prevent tax evasion or avoidance – Article 11 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Legislation of a Member State making it possible to include in a VAT group persons which are not taxable or are exempt from VAT – Condition of 100% ownership of the capital of the other members of the group in order for a VAT group to be formed.#Case T-268/25.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62025TJ0562
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 July 2026.#XXX v Hauptzollamt München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Concept of ‘energy products used for purposes other than as motor fuels or as heating fuels’ – First indent of Article 2(4)(b) of Directive 2003/96/EC – Propane used for the testing of burners.#Case T-562/25.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0661
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability of the European Union – EAGF and EAFRD – Judgment annulling a Commission decision excluding from EU financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the EAGF and EAFRD – Reimbursement by the Commission of the amount unduly received – Commission’s refusal to pay interest on the excess amount received – Obligation to pay interest – Compensation at a standard rate for the loss of enjoyment of the amount unduly paid to the Commission – Article 266 TFEU – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-661/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024TJ0492
Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre élargie) du 15 juillet 2026.#Dimitry Aleksandrovich Beloglazov contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Restriction en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Inscription et maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous h), i), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Notion de “personne qui facilite des violations de l’interdiction de contournement” des mesures restrictives – Critère fondé sur un comportement susceptible de constituer une infraction pénale – Champ d’application territorial du règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Sécurité juridique – Proportionnalité – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-492/24.15 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62026CO0111
Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 July 2026.#Voice - Bundesverband der IT-Anwender eV v European Commission.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Application to intervene – Admissibility of the request – Time limit for lodging – Method for calculating the time limit – Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union – Extension of the time limit on account of distance – Out of time – Effective judicial protection – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-111/26 P(I).14 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0474_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2026.#AR and Others v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 2 – Material scope – Articles 5 and 6 – Principles relating to processing and the lawfulness of processing – Article 9 – Concept of ‘data concerning health’ – Article 10 – Concept of ‘personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences’ – Combating doping in sport – Online publication of the name of a person who has infringed anti-doping rules, the length of time for which that person is banned from participating in sporting events and the reasons for that ban – Balancing of interests – Proportionality – Article 77 – Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority where such publication is imminent.#Case C-474/24.14 July 2026
Court of Justice of the European Union · CELEX 62024CJ0474
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2026.#AR and Others v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 2 – Material scope – Articles 5 and 6 – Principles relating to processing and the lawfulness of processing – Article 9 – Concept of ‘data concerning health’ – Article 10 – Concept of ‘personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences’ – Combating doping in sport – Online publication of the name of a person who has infringed anti-doping rules, the length of time for which that person is banned from participating in sporting events and the reasons for that ban – Balancing of interests – Proportionality – Article 77 – Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority where such publication is imminent.#Case C-474/24.14 July 2026